Design of a Computational Tool for Organic Rankine Cycle Performance Estimation Based on Geothermal Field Data
Keywords:
organic rankine cycle, brine, silica scaling index, simulation toolAbstract
This study evaluates the thermodynamic feasibility of additional power generation from separated brine at a high-temperature geothermal plant in Indonesia, referred to as the “XYZ geothermal plant” to maintain site confidentiality. The plant operates with a single-phase liquid-dominated reservoir, with temperatures ranging from 250 °C to 270 °C and a brine reinjection temperature of approximately 170 °C at a flow rate of 1400 tons per hour.
To ensure safe reinjection conditions, the Silica Scaling Index (SSI) was applied to determine the minimum allowable brine temperature. A finite difference-based Python simulation tool was developed to model heat transfer in the ORC system and assess performance across different working fluids and operating pressures. The results show that n-pentane achieves the best performance, producing a net power output of 5596 kW and a thermal efficiency of 17.21% at an optimal pressure of 1.80 MPa. Isopentane follows closely, while R-1233zd(E) performs less favorably due to pressure constraints.
Model validation against manual calculations resulted in deviations below 0.6%, confirming the simulation’s accuracy. This tool provides a fast and reliable method for evaluating ORC performance and supports practical decision-making for geothermal plant operators. It is intended to assist utilities such as PLN in optimizing geothermal resource utilization.
Downloads
References
PLN, “Feasibility Study of a Binary Geothermal Power Plant at the XYZ Site,” 2024, unpublished manuscript.
B. Saleh, G. Koglbauer, M. Wendland, and J. Fischer, “Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles,” Energy, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1210–1221, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.001.
S. Quoilin, M. Van Den Broek, S. Declaye, P. Dewallef, and V. Lemort, “Techno-economic survey of organic rankine cycle (ORC) systems,” 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.028.
S. Ata, A. KAHRAMAN, and R. ŞAHİN, “Determination of Optimum Pinch Point Temperature Difference Depending on Heat Source Temperature and Organic Fluid with Genetic Algorithm,” Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 19–29, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.21541/apjess.1060748.
M. L. H. and M. O. M. E. W. Lemmon, “NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties—REFPROP, Version 10.0,” 2018, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO: 10.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34-2019, “Designation and Safety Classification of Refrigerants,” 2019. [Online]. Available: www.ashrae.org
Ozone Secretariat, Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Fourteenth edition. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme, 2020.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Substitutes in Industrial Process Air Conditioning," Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program,” https://www.epa.gov/snap/substitutes-industrial-process-air-conditioning. [Accessed: 31-May-2025].
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Phaseout of Class II Ozone-Depleting Substances,” https://www.epa.gov/ods-phaseout/phaseout-class-ii-ozone-depleting-substances.
California Energy Codes and Standards, “Refrigerants and Climate Change,” 2022. Accessed: Jun. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://gettingtozeroforum.org
Haltermann Carless, “High-Purity Hydrocarbons,” https://www.haltermann-carless.com.
Chemours Company, “FreonTM 123 Refrigerant,” https://www.chemours.com.
Honeywell, “Honeywell-Refrigerants-Roadmap_EN_2018,” https://www.honeywell-refrigerants.com/europe/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Honeywell-Refrigerants-Roadmap_EN_2018.pdf.
P. D. Ronald DiPippo, Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact, 3th ed. UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012.
A. Toffolo, A. Lazzaretto, G. Manente, and M. Paci, “A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems,” Appl Energy, vol. 121, pp. 219–232, May 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.089.
D. C. Denkenberger, M. J. Brandemuehl, J. Zhai, and J. M. Pearce, “Finite Difference Heat Exchanger Model: Flow Maldistribution with Thermal Coupling,” Heat Transfer Engineering, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 889–903, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01457632.2020.1756060.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITB Graduate School Conference

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
