Analysis of Geothermal Fluid Pipe Behavior in Dry Steam Geothermal Power Plant under Dynamic Load

Authors

  • Helmi Zakaria Institut Teknologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  • Raden Dadan Ramdan Institut Teknologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  • Jooned Hendrarsakti Institut Teknologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

Piping system, Geothermal Power Plant, Dynamic Behavior, Modal Analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic behavior of a dry steam geothermal fluid piping system located in a seismically active region of West Java, Indonesia. Given the potential for resonance under earthquake-induced dynamic loads, modal analysis was conducted using ANSYS finite element software to determine the piping system's natural frequencies and mode shapes. The piping system, spanning 186 meters, was modeled with fixed and roller supports to reflect realistic boundary conditions. Analysis results revealed that while the first mode (10.31 Hz) falls within the critical earthquake frequency range, its low mass participation indicates minimal influence on system response. In contrast, the twenty-fifth mode (31.12 Hz) exhibits deformation patterns more aligned with expected seismic excitation, with its frequency exceeding the dominant earthquake spectrum. Thus, the system is not considered highly susceptible to resonance. This study underscores the importance of modal analysis in assessing seismic resilience and confirms the structural adequacy of the piping design under dynamic loads.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Koorey, “Determination of The Optimal Pipe Supports Spans for Geothermal Pipelines,” 2000.

F. Jonsdottir, G. O. Agustsson, and M. T. Jonsson, “Seismic Design of Geothermal Pipeline Supports,” in ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, CA, 2002.

N. F. Saari et al., “Estimating Natural Frequency of Pipe with Various Geometries: Improvement of Frequency Factors,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26148.

A. A. Sekacheva, L. G. Pastukhova, V. N. Alekhin, and A. S. Noskov, “Natural Frequencies of a Vertical Pipeline Element,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, Mar. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/481/1/012019.

L.-C. Peng and T.-L. Peng, Pipe Stress Engineering. ASME Press, 2009.

ANSYS, ANSYS Mechanical APDL Structural Analysis Guide. Canonsburg, PA: SAS IP, Inc, 2013.

X. Wang, P. Zhou, Y. Ma, and G. Hu, “Optimization Design on Resonance Avoidance for 3D Piping Systems based on Wave Approach,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 201, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104872.

I. Nakamura and N. Kasahara, “Numerical Examination on Seismic Response Behavior of a Piping System Considering the Plastic Deformation of Supports,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 211, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105265.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung Dan Non Gedung (SNI 1726:2019),” BSN, Jakarta, 2019.

American Society of Civil Engineers, “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10),” Reston, VA, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Zakaria, H., Ramdan, R. D., & Hendrarsakti, J. (2025). Analysis of Geothermal Fluid Pipe Behavior in Dry Steam Geothermal Power Plant under Dynamic Load. ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1), 558–567. Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/696