Techno-Economic Study of Green Hydrogen Production Process at Krueng Isep Micro-Hydro Power Plant (MHPP) in Nagan Raya, Aceh

Authors

  • Abi Yusuf Aulia Department of Chemical Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
  • Graecia Lugito Department of Chemical Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40116, Indonesia
  • Johnner Sitompul Department of Chemical Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia

Keywords:

Green Hydrogen, Alkaline Electrolyzer, Solid Oxide Electrolyzer, Techno-Economic Analysis, Micro-Hydro Power Plant

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the potential of green hydrogen production using Alkaline Electrolyzer (AEL) technology powered by electricity from the Krueng Isep Micro-Hydro Power Plant (PLTMh) in Aceh, Indonesia. AEL was selected due to its commercial availability, high technological maturity, competitive capital costs, and strong operational durability. The study was conducted through simulation using Aspen HYSYS V14 under two input power scenarios: 40,5 kW, based on validated operating data from the Tanjung Jati Electric Steam Power Plant, and a scaled-up scenario of 25 modules from the original hydrogen plant at Tanjung Jati, reaching 1.012,5 kW. Both scenarios were simulated under constant operating conditions of 10,3 bar and 60,5°C. Simulation results show that increasing input power significantly boosts the hydrogen production rate, from 0,50 kg/h to 12,52 kg/h. However, this also increases the specific energy consumption from 291 GJ/kg to 7,277 GJ/kg, indicating energy efficiency challenges at larger scales. Economically, higher input capacity requires greater CAPEX but yields a higher Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 16% compared to 12%, while maintaining the same Payback Period (PbP) of 5,59 years. In addition, the Net Present Value (NPV) is substantially higher at larger scale. In conclusion, AEL technology is technically and economically viable for green hydrogen production based on micro-hydro sources. Improving energy efficiency and managing operational costs are key strategies to support Indonesia’s transition toward a clean and sustainable energy future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kakavand, A., Sayadi, S., Tsatsaronis, G., & Behbahaninia, A. (2023). Techno-economic assessment of green hydrogen and ammonia production from wind and solar energy in Iran. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(38), 14170–14191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.28

IRENA Renewable Cost Database (2020): Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020, International Renewable Energy Agency, 1–160.

Abdalla, A. M., Hossain, S., Nisfindy, O. B., Azad, A. T., Dawood, M., & Azad, A. K. (2018). Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 165, 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.088

Amini Horri, B., & Ozcan, H. (2024). Green hydrogen production by water electrolysis: Current status and challenges. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 47, 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100932

Zhang, T., Uratani, J., Huang, Y., Xu, L., Griffiths, S., & Ding, Y. (2023). Hydrogen liquefaction and storage: Recent progress and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 176, 113204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113204

National Green Hydrogen Mission _ Current Affairs _ Vision IAS. (n.d.).

Shiva Kumar, S., & Lim, H. (2022). An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Reports, 8, 13793–13813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.127

Elrhoul, D., Naveiro, M., & Romero Gómez, M. (2024). Thermo-Economic Comparison between Three Different Electrolysis Technologies Powered by a Conventional Organic Rankine Cycle for the Green Hydrogen Production Onboard Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081287

Setiawan, A. D. (2010). Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikrohidro: Solusi Energi Terbarukan untuk Daerah Terpencil. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Kumar, A., & Katoch, S. S. (2014). Micro Hydro Power: A Review of Current Status and Future Prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 779-785.

Harun, Y. (2016). Studi Kelayakan PLTMh untuk Daerah Pedesaan. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung Press.

Nguyen, Q. T. (2018). Community-Based Micro Hydro Power Systems in Rural Areas: Economic and Social Implications. Renewable Energy Journal, 45(12), 223-230.

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2019). Renewable Energy Technologies: Hydropower. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

Siska, D. (2016). Perencanaan Kawasan Wisata di Daerah PLTA Kuta Malaka Aceh Besar NAD dengan Teknologi Tepat Guna dan Ramah Lingkungan. In Jurnal Arsitekno (Vol. 7, Issue 7).

Samsun, R. C., Peters, R., Stolten, D., & Robinius, M. (2020). Development and evaluation of an open-source techno-economic model for high-temperature solid oxide electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(30), 15188–15201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.090

Reuß, M., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Preuster, P., Wasserscheid, P., & Stolten, D. (2019). Seasonal storage and alternative carriers: A flexible hydrogen supply chain model. Applied Energy, 200, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.050

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Aulia, A. Y., Lugito, G., & Sitompul, J. (2025). Techno-Economic Study of Green Hydrogen Production Process at Krueng Isep Micro-Hydro Power Plant (MHPP) in Nagan Raya, Aceh. ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1). Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/760