Evaluating the Economic Feasibility of Green Hydrogen from Hydropower Surplus Using Alkaline Electrolysis
Keywords:
Green Hydrogen, Surplus Hydropower, LCOH, Alkaline Electrolyzer, Techno-economic analysisAbstract
The growing demand for clean energy and the urgency to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 have placed green hydrogen at the center of decarbonization strategies. This study presents a techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production using surplus electricity from hydropower, particularly during rainy seasons when generation exceeds grid demand. A capacity-based approach is employed to estimate surplus energy, which is then used to calculate the required electrolyzer capacity and the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH). Using a 20.8 MW alkaline electrolyzer operating at a 75% capacity factor, and a specific energy consumption of 56.69 kWh/kg H2, the base case LCOH is found to be 3.41 USD/kg. A sensitivity analysis shows that electricity price and capacity factor are the most influential parameters affecting LCOH, followed by electrolyzer scale and installation year. Results suggest that optimizing these parameters can significantly improve the economic feasibility of green hydrogen production. The findings highlight the potential of utilizing existing hydropower infrastructure to support hydrogen generation in a cost-effective and scalable manner, especially in developing regions with abundant but underutilized renewable resources.
Downloads
References
IEA, “Global Hydrogen Review 2021,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2021
IRENA, Geopolitics of the energy transformation : the hydrogen factor. International Renewable Energy Agency, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Jan/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transformation-Hydrogen
IRENA, Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction Scaling Up Electrolysers To Meet The 1.5°C Climate Goal. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Dec/IRENA_Green_hydrogen_cost_2020.pdf
M. T. Zun and B. C. McLellan, “Cost Projection of Global Green Hydrogen Production Scenarios,” Hydrogen (Switzerland), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 932–960, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/hydrogen4040055.
A. Ursua, L. M. Gandia, and P. Sanchis, “Hydrogen Production From Water Electrolysis: Current Status and Future Trends,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 410–426, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2156750.
IEA, “Hydropower Special Market Report,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/83ff8935-62dd-4150-80a8-c5001b740e21/HydropowerSpecialMarketReport.pdf
C. Berna-Escriche, C. Vargas-Salgado, D. Alfonso-Solar, and A. Escrivá-Castells, “Hydrogen Production from Surplus Electricity Generated by an Autonomous Renewable System: Scenario 2040 on Grand Canary Island, Spain,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 19, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141911884.
IEA, Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2022. OECD, 2022. doi: 10.1787/10bc5730-en.
A. Paudel et al., “Hydrogen production from surplus hydropower: Techno-economic assessment with alkaline electrolysis in Nepal’s perspective,” Jul. 12, 2024, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.117.
PLN, “Statistik PLN 2024,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://web.pln.co.id/stakeholder/laporan-statistik
M. Bodner, A. Hofer, and V. Hacker, “H2 generation from alkaline electrolyzer,” WIREs Energy and Environment, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 365–381, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/wene.150.
C. Li and J.-B. Baek, “The promise of hydrogen production from alkaline anion exchange membrane electrolyzers,” Nano Energy, vol. 87, p. 106162, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106162.
M. Sánchez, E. Amores, D. Abad, L. Rodríguez, and C. Clemente-Jul, “Aspen Plus model of an alkaline electrolysis system for hydrogen production,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 3916–3929, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.027.
D. Jang, J. Kim, D. Kim, W.-B. Han, and S. Kang, “Techno-economic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of green hydrogen production technology through various water electrolysis technologies,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 258, p. 115499, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115499.
A. Nicita, G. Maggio, A. P. F. Andaloro, and G. Squadrito, “Green hydrogen as feedstock: Financial analysis of a photovoltaic-powered electrolysis plant,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 20, pp. 11395–11408, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.062.
A. H. Reksten, M. S. Thomassen, S. Møller-Holst, and K. Sundseth, “Projecting the future cost of PEM and alkaline water electrolysers; a CAPEX model including electrolyser plant size and technology development,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 90, pp. 38106–38113, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.306.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITB Graduate School Conference

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
