Uncertainty Analysis at Poigar River Discharge Base On El Nino Southern Ocillation (ENSO) Index Impact Using Monte Carlo Method

Authors

  • Catur Arie Nugroho Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • T.B. Satya Putra Dana P. Strategic Regulation and Law Risk Division, PT PLN (Persero)
  • Hakim Luthfi Malasan Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Keywords:

hydro power plant, ENSO, efficiency, machine learning, NINO 3.4

Abstract

PLN has established long-term objectives detailed in Electricity Supply Business Plan for 2021-2030, focusing providing an adequate, reliable, and efficient electricity supply to ensure national energy security such like Hydro Power Plant Development, leveraging Indonesia abundant river system as sustainable energy sources. However, this development is highly sensitive to climate and local hydrological condition. One major external factor is El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The Sea Surface Temperature NINO represents ENSO data, which serves as an external indicator reflecting changes in sea surface temperature, which are used to identify the occurrence of La Niña or El Niño events. These fluctuations greatly affect river discharge and affecting in electricity generation by Hydropower Plants. This study proposes a machine learning based model that integrates SST NINO 3.4 as dynamic indicators with local climate and hydrological data to improve dependable flow estimation. The SEMMA framework was used for structured analysis, from data exploration to model assessment, applying both Monte Carlo and Latin Hypercube sampling methods. Using SEMMA framework was used for structured analysis, from data exploration to model assessment, applying both Monte Carlo and Latin Hypercube sampling methods. Results show that using SST NINO 3.4 Index help improves model performance across all metrics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Kim, “Indonesia’s Restrained State Capitalism: Development and Policy Challenges,” J. Contemp. Asia, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 419–446, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00472336.2019.1675084.

H. Ardiansyah, “Hydropower Technology: Potential, Challenges, and the Future,” Indones. Post-Pandemic Outlook Strateg. Towar. Net-Zero Emiss. by 2060 from Renewables Carbon-Neutral Energy Perspect., pp. 89–107, 2022, doi: 10.55981/brin.562.c6.

W. Hidayat, “Prinsip kerja dan komponen - komponen pembangkit listrik tenaga air (PLTA),” Prinsip Kerja dan Kompon. - Kompon. Pembangkit List. Tenaga Air, no. March, p. https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/drv58/, 2019, doi: 10.31227/osf.io/drv58.

L. M. Limantara, Rekayasa Hidrologi: Edisi Revisi. Jogjakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2019.

S. Lestari, J. I. Hamada, F. Syamsudin, Sunaryo, J. Matsumoto, and M. D. Yamanaka, “ENSO influences on rainfall extremes around Sulawesi and Maluku Islands in the eastern Indonesian maritime continent,” Sci. Online Lett. Atmos., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 2016, doi: 10.2151/sola.2016-008.

A. R. Nugroho, I. Tamagawa, and M. Harada, “The relationship between river flow regimes and climate indices of ENSO and IOD on code river, southern Indonesia,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/w13101375.

R. Rahmiati and I. Mandang, “Pengaruh El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Terhadap Debit Sungai Mahakam Kalimantan Timur,” Geosains Kutai Basin, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3–6, 2023, doi: 10.30872/geofisunmul.v5i2.1064.

F. Hasan, P. Medley, J. Drake, and G. Chen, “Advancing Hydrology through Machine Learning: Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions Using the CAMELS, Caravan, GRDC, CHIRPS, PERSIANN, NLDAS, GLDAS, and GRACE Datasets,” Water, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 1904, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16131904.

B. M. Greenwell, B. C. Boehmke, and A. J. McCarthy, “A Simple and Effective Model-Based Variable Importance Measure,” pp. 1–27, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04755

A. Wicaksono, “Pengaruh Fenomena La Nina Terhadap Anomali Curah Hujan Bulanan Di Sulawesi Selatan,” Bul. Meteorol. Klimatologi, Dan Geofis., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 35–49, 2022.

A. H. Milley, J. D. Seabolt, and J. S. Williams, “Data Mining and the Case for Sampling. A SAS Institute Best Practices,” SAS Inst., pp. 1–36, 1998, [Online]. Available: http://sceweb.uhcl.edu/boetticher/ML_DataMining/SAS-SEMMA.pdf

A. Azevedo and M. F. Santos, “KDD, semma and CRISP-DM: A parallel overview,” MCCSIS’08 - IADIS Multi Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. Proc. Informatics 2008 Data Min. 2008, no. January 2008, pp. 182–185, 2008.

U. Shafique and H. Qaiser, “A Comparative Study of Data Mining Process Models ( KDD , CRISP-DM and SEMMA ),” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 217–222, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/

Omari Firas, “A combination of SEMMA & CRISP-DM models for effectively handling big data using formal concept analysis based knowledge discovery: A data mining approach,” World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 009–014, 2023, doi: 10.30574/wjaets.2023.8.1.0147.

F. Olaiya and A. B. Adeyemo, “Application of Data Mining Techniques in Weather Prediction and Climate Change Studies,” Int. J. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2012, doi: 10.5815/ijieeb.2012.01.07.

H. S. Lee, “General Rainfall Patterns in Indonesia and the Potential Impacts of Local Seas on Rainfall Intensity,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1751–1768, 2015, doi: 10.3390/w7041751.

M. Z. Alfiqri, G. Handoyo, and R. Widiaratih, “Pengaruh El Niño 2015-2016 dan La Niña 2020-2021 Terhadap SPL, Klorofil-A, dan Intensitas Curah Hujan di Laut Sulawesi,” Indones. J. Oceanogr., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 239–248, 2024, doi: 10.14710/ijoce.v6i3.20009.

R. Mbuvha, J. Y. P. Adounkpe, W. T. Mongwe, M. Houngnibo, N. Newlands, and T. Marwala, “Imputation of Missing Streamflow Data at Multiple Gauging Stations in Benin Republic,” 2022, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11576

N. Kedam, D. K. Tiwari, V. Kumar, K. M. Khedher, and M. A. Salem, “River stream flow prediction through advanced machine learning models for enhanced accuracy,” Results Eng., vol. 22, no. March, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102215.

J. S. Clark, Model Assessment and Selection. 2020. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv15r5dgv.9.

C. Molnar et al., “Relating the Partial Dependence Plot and Permutation Feature Importance to the Data Generating Process,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 1901 CCIS, pp. 456–479, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-44064-9_24.

J. Moosbauer, J. Herbinger, G. Casalicchio, M. Lindauer, and B. Bischl, “Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plots,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 3, no. NeurIPS, pp. 2280–2291, 2021.

J. Liu, Z. Zhou, S. Kong, and Z. Ma, “Application of random forest based on semi-automatic parameter adjustment for optimization of anti-breast cancer drugs,” Front. Oncol., vol. 12, no. July, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.956705.

L. Weinhold, M. Schmid, M. N. Wright, and M. Berger, “A Random Forest Approach for Modeling Bounded Outcomes,” no. i, pp. 1–19, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06211.

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Arie Nugroho, C., Dana P., T. S. P., & Malasan, H. L. (2025). Uncertainty Analysis at Poigar River Discharge Base On El Nino Southern Ocillation (ENSO) Index Impact Using Monte Carlo Method. ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1). Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/573