Implementation Analysis of Emission Reduction System for SO₂, NO₂, and Hg Emission Reduction Equipment in Coal-Fired Power Plants

Authors

  • Arifta Suryanugraha Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Wibawa Hendra Saputera Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Winny Wulandari Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Keywords:

CFPP, SO2 Emission, NO2 Emission, Mercury Emission, Net Zero Emission

Abstract

Coal-Fired Power-Plants (CFPP) have four main emission parameters: SO₂, NO₂, particulate matter, and Hg. Currently, many existing CFPP have yet to install emission reduction equipment for SO₂, NO₂, and Hg emission. This study aims to evaluate the technical and economic impacts of implementing emission reduction equipment in existing CFPP with capacities between 50 and 1000 MW. This study is conducted using SteamPro–Thermoflow, a well-known software in the thermal power plant industry for heat and mass balance analysis. The simulations show that Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) achieves 80% NO₂ reduction efficiency, higher than Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) at 40%. For SO₂ reduction, Wet and Sea Water Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD and SWFGD) reach 95%, while Semi-Dry FGD (SDFGD) achieves 90%. Activated Carbon Injection (ACI) for mercury (Hg) reduction achieves 60%, and up to 85% when combined with FGD. For auxiliary power consumption, at 0.01–0.03% of gross power for NO₂ reduction, 0.25–0.50% for SO₂ reduction, and 0.17–0.22% for Hg reduction. Investment costs are 50–120 USD/kW for SNCR, 5–20 USD/kW for SCR, 10–35 USD/kW for ACI, and 32–110 USD/kW for FGD. The study results are expected to guide emission reduction policies in power generation sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dat, N. D., Hoang, N., Huyen, M. T., Huy, D. T. N., & Lan, L. M. (2020). Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(5), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10243

Simanjuntak, U., and Hasjanah, K. (2023). Energy Transition is a Game Changer to Achieve Indonesia Emas 2045 Ambition. https://iesr.or.id/en/energy-transition-is-a-game-changer-to-achieve-indonesia-emas-2045-ambition/

PT PLN (Persero). (2021). Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) PT PLN (Persero) Periode 2021-2030. https://web.pln.co.id/statics/uploads/2021/10/ruptl-2021-2030.pdf

International Energy Agency (IEA) Special Report. (2021). An Energy Sector Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions in Indonesia. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/b496b141-8c3b-47fc-adb2-90740eb0b3b8/AnEnergySectorRoadmaptoNetZeroEmissionsinIndonesia.pdf

The Centre of Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). (2023). Health Benefits of Just Energy Transition and Coal Phase-out in Indonesia. https://energyandcleanair.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CREA_IESR_Health-Benefits-of-Just-Energy-Transition-and-Coal-Phase-out-in-Indonesia_EN_07.2023.pdf

Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Baku Mutu Emisi Sumber Tidak Bergerak Bagi Usaha dan/atau Kegiatan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Termal. https://jdih.menlhk.go.id/new2/home/portfolioDetails2/p.21.pdf/21/2008/9

Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Baku Mutu Emisi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Termal. https://peraturan.go.id/id/permen-lhk-no-p-15-menlhk-setjen-kum-1-4-2019-tahun-2019

The Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). (2024). Comparison of Coal Power Plant Emissions Standards. https://energyandcleanair.org/comparison-of-coal-power-plant-emissions-standards

European Commission. (2006). Communication From the Commission to The Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions.

EU: COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (2017). Establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants. 28 Apr 2017. Industrial Emissions Directive.

India: Ministry of Environment (2015). Forest & Climate Change, Gazette Notification SO 3305(E), 7th December 2015.

South Korea: 대기환경보전법 시행규칙 [시행 2021. 7. 14.] [환경부령 제922호, 2021. 6. 30., 일부개정].

U.S.: EPA (2012). 40 CFR Parts 60 and 63. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial, Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units; Final Rule

PT PLN (Persero). (2022). Sustainability Report Supplement. https://web.pln.co.id/statics/uploads/2023/09/PLN-ESG-Performance-Report-2022-1.pdf

Reza, Alfian M. (2023). Emisi PLTU, Regulasi, dan Peralatan Pengendali. Jakarta: PLN Enjiniring. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32975.66729

Sorrels, J. L., Randall, D. D., Fry, C. R., & Schaffner, K. S. (2019). Chapter 1 - Selective Noncatalytic Reduction.

Kim, H.-S., Kasipandi, S., Kim, J., Kang, S.-H., Kim, J.-H., Ryu, J.-H., & Bae, J.-W. (2020). Current Catalyst Technology of Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) for NOx Removal in South Korea. Catalysts, 10(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010052

Sorrels, J. L., Randall, D. D., Schaffner, K. S., & Richardson Fry, C. (2019). Chapter 2 Selective Catalytic Reduction.

Park, P.-M., Park, Y.-K., & Dong, J.-I. (2021). Reaction Characteristics of NOx and N2O in Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction Using Various Reducing Agents and Additives. Atmosphere, 12(9), 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091175

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2023). NOx Emission Control Technology Installation Timing for Non-EGU Sources. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-03/NOx%20Control%20Installation%20Timing_FinalReport_GoodNeighborFinalRule.pdf

Gazda-Grzywacz, M., Winconek, Ł., & Burmistrz, P. (2021). Carbon Footprint for Mercury Capture from Coal-Fired Boiler Flue Gas. Energies, 14(13), 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133844

Granite, E. J., Pennline, H. W., & Senior, C. (Eds.). (2015). Mercury control: for coal-derived gas streams. John Wiley & Sons.

Peraturan Bupati Kulon Progo Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Rencana Aksi Daerah Penghapusan Merkuri. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/167772/perbup-kab-kulon-progo-no-18-tahun-2021

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Suryanugraha, A., Saputera, W. H., & Wulandari, W. (2025). Implementation Analysis of Emission Reduction System for SO₂, NO₂, and Hg Emission Reduction Equipment in Coal-Fired Power Plants. ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1), 645–656. Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/476