Comparison of Mooc Application User Experience in Indonesia (Case Studies: Ruang Guru and Zenius)
Keywords:
application, massive open online learning (MOOC), user experience, usability testingAbstract
The development of science and technology affects various learning media, one of which is distance learning such as the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). The characteristics of the MOOC Platform are the system is open for public, users can choose a specific topic, the entire learning process is carried out online and the video-based learning materials. Some well-known MOOC’s are the Coursera and Udemy apps. The MOOC applications that have developed in Indonesia are Ruang Guru and Zenius, but it is not yet known how the user experience (UX) in MOOC applications in Indonesia. This study aims to find out how the user experience (UX) response in the Ruang Guru and Zenius applications. This research method uses a moderated remote usability test with seven aspects of Honeycomb UX. The stages of the method carried out consist of facilitator (researcher), task, and participant (user). The research subjects consisted of five student participants from several Universities in Indonesia. The result obtained is that users feel more comfortable using the Zenius application. This is because the Zenius application design system is more integrated, the navigation is easier to understand, and the buttons and the text have good readability.
Downloads
References
Nurhudatiana, A., & Caesarion, A. S., Exploring User Experience of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Case Study of Millennial Learners in Jakarta-Indonesia, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 44–49, April. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383923.3383968.
Siemens, G. Connectivism., A learning theory for the digital age. elearnspace. 2004.
Gamage, D., Fernando, S., & Perera, I., Factors leading to an effective MOOC from participiants perspective. In 2015 8th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (UMEDIA). pp. 230-235. IEEE. August, 2015.
Florjančič, V., Open Education–A Challenge for E-training. In International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education Challenges. Springer, Cham. pp. 168-180, July, 2016.
Korableva, O., Durand, T., Kalimullina, O., & Stepanova, I., Studying user satisfaction with the MOOC platform interfaces using the example of coursera and open education platforms. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 26–30. 2019.
Sethi, R., Studying Unintended Consequences of Using MOOC Interface: an Affordance Perspective to Address the Dropout Problem in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 621-624. 1–4, March, 2017.
Rex Hartson, P. S. P., The UX Book Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. In Morgan Kaufmann is an imprint of Elsevier 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA (Vol. 1). 2012.
Hertzum, M. Usability Testing: A Practitioner’s Guide to Evaluating the User Experience (P. S. U. John M. Carroll (ed.)). Morgan and Claypool, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00987ED1V01Y202001HCI045.
Morville, P., Experience Design Unplugged. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Web program (pp. 10-es). June, 2004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1187335.1187347.
Mansson, L., Wiklund, M., Öhberg, F., Danielsson, K., & Sandlund, M., Co-Creation with Older Adults to Improve User-Experience of a Smartphone Self-Test Application to Assess Balance Function. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(11), 3768, 2020.
Mcfadden, E., Hager, D. R., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., Mcfadden, E., Hager, D. R., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., Mcfadden, E., Hager, D. R., Elie, C. J., & Blackwell, J. M., Remote Usability Evaluation: Overview and Case Studies Remote Usability Evaluation: Overview and Case Studies. International journal of human-computer interaction, 14(3-4), 489-502. Juni, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2002.9669131.
Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A., The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: Effects on user behaviour , subjective evaluation and emotion. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 670–677. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.006
Meng, P. W., Deloitte Consumer Insights Dawn of the digital age in Indonesia, Dawn of the digital age in Indonesia, Issue Januari. 2020.
Kusuma, W., Rokhmawati, R. I., & Ananta, M. T., Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna pada Aplikasi Mobile Learning dengan menggunakan UX Honeycomb, Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer e-ISSN, 2548, 964X. 2019
