Technical and Economic Assessment of Excess Power Utilization from Geothermal Power Plants
Keywords:
Hydrogen, Geothermal Power Plant, Levelized Cost of Hydrogen, Levelized Cost of ElectricityAbstract
The utilization of geothermal energy in Indonesia continues to grow; however, the installed capacity of geothermal power plants has not yet been fully optimized, particularly during periods of low system load. This study investigates the potential use of excess power from geothermal power plants to produce hydrogen via Alkaline Water Electrolysis (AWE) technology and evaluates its technical and economic feasibility. Simulations using Process Simulator were conducted for three input power scenarios (3.40 MW, 10.19 MW and 15.26 MW) to analyze hydrogen production rates, specific energy consumption, and HHV and LHV efficiencies. The simulation results indicate that the AWE system is capable of producing up to 335.82 kg/h of hydrogen, achieving HHV efficiency of up to 97.8% and LHV efficiency of up to 82.7% at lower power input. However, increasing the input power leads to a decrease in efficiency and an increase in specific energy consumption, reaching 156,244 kJ/kg H₂ at the highest power level. From an economic perspective, the calculated Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) ranges between 0.665–0.997 USD/kg H₂, while the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) generated from reconverting hydrogen to electricity falls within 36–54 USD/MWh, making it highly competitive compared to fossil-based power sources. These findings indicate that using excess geothermal power for hydrogen production is an efficient low-carbon energy storage solution. Furthermore, to optimize thermal integration within geothermal power plants, the Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) technology should be considered, as it can directly utilize waste heat to enhance energy conversion efficiency. Therefore, integrating AWE or SOEC with geothermal power plants presents a promising strategy to support Indonesia’s clean energy transition.
Downloads
References
R. Lund, J. W., Freeston, D. H., and Boyd, T. L. (2011) : Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2010 worldwide review, Geothermics, 40(3), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.07.004
Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia 2020, Jakarta: Kementerian ESDM, 2020.
Kumar, S.S.; Lim, H. An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 13793–13813
Burton, N.A.; Padilla, R.V.; Rose, A.; Habibullah, H. Increasing the efficiency of hydrogen production from solar powered water electrolysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110255.
Schmidt, O.; Gambhir, A.; Staffell, I.; Hawkes, A.; Nelson, J.; Few, S. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 30470–30492.
Karayel, G. K., Javani, N., and Dincer, I. (2022): Effective use of geothermal energy for hydrogen production: A comprehensive application, Energy, 249, 123597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123597.
Hauck, M., Herrmann, S., and Spliethoff, H. (2017): Simulation of a reversible SOFC with hysys Plus, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(15), 10329–10340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.189
Mohebali Nejadian, M., Ahmadi, P., and Houshfar, E. (2023): Comparative optimization study of three novel integrated hydrogen production systems with SOEC, PEM, and alkaline electrolyzer, Fuel, 336(November 2022), 126835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126835.
J. H. Jeong, H. S. Park, Y. K. Park, and T. S. Kim, “Analysis of the influence of hydrogen cofiring on the operation and performance of the gas turbine and combined cycle,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 54, p. 104061, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104061.
Wang, F., Wang, L., Zhang, H., Xia, L., Miao, H., and Yuan, J. (2021): Design and optimization of hydrogen production by solid oxide electrolyzer with marine engine waste heat recovery and ORC cycle, Energy Conversion and Management, 229(November 2020), 113775.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113775.
Wendel, C. H. (2015): Design and Analysis of Reversible Solid Oxide Cell Systems for Electrical Energy Storage.
Zhao, Y., Xue, H., Jin, X., Xiong, B., Liu, R., Peng, Y., Jiang, L., and Tian, G. (2021): System level heat integration and efficiency analysis of hydrogen production process based on solid oxide electrolysis cells, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(77), 38163–38174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.105.
Lebègue, E. Allen J. Bard, Larry. R. Faulkner, Henry S. White: Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edition, Wiley. Transit Met Chem 48, 433–436 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11243-023-00555-6
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITB Graduate School Conference

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
