Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of CCUS Implementation and Biomass Co-Firing System for Teluk Balikpapan Coal-Fired Power Plant (CFPP)

Authors

  • Muhammad Iqbal Bayhaqi Fauzy Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
  • Retno Gumilang Dewi Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

Keywords:

CCUS, Biomass Co-Firing, Balikpapan CFPP, Technical Optimization, Economic Analysis, Carbon Capture

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of implementing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technology as well as biomass co-firing systems at the Teluk Balikpapan 2×110 MW Steam Power Plant (PLTU). CO₂ capture simulations were performed using a post-combustion approach with amine solvents, comparing the efficiency between MEA/PZ and MDEA/PZ mixtures. The simulation results show that the MEA/PZ solvent achieved a CO₂ capture efficiency of up to 92.4%, with a lower regeneration energy requirement compared to MDEA/PZ. Co-firing with biomass (wood bark and palm kernel) affects the flue gas characteristics, increasing the energy consumption of the CO₂ capture system, but still results in a CO₂ purity of 99.2%. The economic analysis indicates that this CCS project is financially viable with an IRR of 10.02%, an LCOE of IDR 2,400.51 /kWh, and an investment payback period of 6.96 years. These findings confirm that integrating CCUS and biomass co-firing in an existing power plant can serve as a sustainable energy transition strategy to reduce carbon emissions in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rochelle, G. T. (2009). Amine scrubbing for CO₂ capture. Science, 325(5948), 1652–1654. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176731

Gao, H., Wang, X., & Li, L. (2020). Process simulation and economic analysis of amine-based CO₂ capture from coal-fired power plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 94, 102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102902

Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., et al. (2018). Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5), 1062–1176. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02342A

PT PLN (2021). Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) PT PLN (Persero) 2021-2030.

Hilliard, M. D. (2008). A predictive thermodynamic model for an aqueous blend of potassium carbonate, piperazine, and monoethanolamine for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin].

Ahn, H., Luberti, M., Liu, Z., & Brandani, S. (2013). Process configuration studies of the amine-based CO₂ capture process using process simulation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 16, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.03.003

Idem, R., Tontiwachwuthikul, P., & Chakma, A. (2006). Pilot plant studies of CO₂ capture by aqueous monoethanolamine and its blends. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(8), 2414–2420. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050569v

Cousins, A., Wardhaugh, L. T., & Feron, P. H. M. (2011). A survey of process flow sheet modifications for energy efficient CO₂ capture from flue gases using chemical absorption. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(4), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.01.005

Boot-Handford, M. E., et al. (2014). Carbon capture and storage update. Energy & Environmental Science, 7(1), 130–189. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE42350F

Alie, C., Backham, L., Croiset, E., & Douglas, P. L. (2005). Simulation of CO₂ capture using MEA scrubbing: A flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Conversion and Management, 46(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.03.001

Kim, I., & Svendsen, H. F. (2011). Heat of absorption of CO₂ with alkanolamines: New experimental data. Chemical Engineering Science, 66(21), 4995–5003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.07.027

Dutcher, B., Fan, M., & Russell, A. G. (2015). Amine-based CO₂ capture technology development from the beginning of 2013 – A review. Applied Energy, 151, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.115

Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2016). Economic analysis of carbon capture and storage in supercritical coal power plants. Energy Procedia, 100, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.156

Liang, Z., Rongwong, W., Gelowitz, D., & Idem, R. (2015). Performance of MEA and blended MEA-based solvents for CO₂ capture from flue gas in pilot-scale operation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 36, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007

Leeson, D., Mac Dowell, N., Shah, N., Petit, C., & Fennell, P. S. (2017). A techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries. Energy Procedia, 114, 6297–6312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1804

Liu, Y., Chen, C., Zhang, Z., & Chen, Q. (2013). CO₂ absorption and desorption in aqueous amine blends of MEA with AMP and MDEA. Chemical Engineering Science, 104, 988–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.038

Noothout, P., Wiersma, F., Hurtado, O., Roelofsen, P., & Macdonald, D. (2014). CO2 Pipeline Infrastructure. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEAGHG).

PJB. (2020). Analisa Karakteristik Pengujian Co-Firing Cangkang Sawit (Palm Kernel Shell) di PLTU Teluk Balikpapan 2x110 MW.

Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. (2010). Co-firing of biomass with coal: Constraints and role of biomass pre-treatment. Fuel, 89(10), 2513–2530.

Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2012). A proposed methodology for CO₂ capture and storage cost estimates. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 10, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.004

Rubin, E. S., Mantripragada, H., Marks, A., Versteeg, P., & Kitchin, J. (2015). The cost of CO₂ capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018

Kemper, J. (2015). Development of CO₂ capture, transport and storage technology in the EU. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 38, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.010

ZEP (Zero Emissions Platform). (2011). The Costs of CO₂ Capture, Transport and Storage. Brussels: European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants.

Abanades, J. C., Rubin, E. S., Mazzotti, M., & Herzog, H. J. (2017). On the climate change mitigation potential of CO₂ capture and storage. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(7), 3962–3972. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04390

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Fauzy, M. I. B., & Dewi, R. G. (2025). Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of CCUS Implementation and Biomass Co-Firing System for Teluk Balikpapan Coal-Fired Power Plant (CFPP). ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1), 842–855. Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/629