A Conceptual Framework for the Selection of Biomass Alternatives for Coal Co-firing using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approach
Keywords:
Biomass Cofiring, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Analytic Hierarchy Process, SEM-PLS, Renewable EnergyAbstract
The increasing demand for sustainable energy and the need to reduce carbon emissions have driven the implementation of biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants. Selecting appropriate biomass alternatives for co-firing is a complex decision involving multiple technical, economic, environmental, social, and regulatory considerations. This study aims to develop a conceptual framework for selecting biomass alternatives for co-firing in coal power plants. The framework integrates Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) to identify and prioritize key selection criteria. The model consists of five main criteria technical, economic, environmental, social, and policy/regulation with a total of 14 validated sub-criteria. The dependent variable, Selection of Biomass Alternative, is measured by four biomass types: Rice Husk, Wood Pellet, Palm Kernel Shell, and Sawdust. The proposed framework provides a comprehensive tool to support decision-making and ensure the sustainable implementation of biomass co-firing.
Downloads
References
International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2021. Paris: IEA, 2021.
PLN, Perdir PLN No. 001.P/DIR/2020 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Co-firing PLTU Berbahan Bakar Batubara dengan Bahan Bakar Biomassa, Jakarta: PT PLN (Persero), 2020.
A. Ahmudi, I. Garniwa, C. Hudaya, T. Suryono, and N. Dewi, “Optimizing potential supply chain of biomass agricultural waste for co-firing of coal power plant using MCDA, GIS, and linear programming,” Leuser J. Environ. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025.
U. Ciptomulyono, Paradigma Multi Kriteria untuk Pemilihan Program Kerja yang Berwawasan Lingkungan. Surabaya: ITS Press, 2010.
F. B. D. Filho, L. V. M. de Sousa, E. E. S. Lora, and C. R. Cardoso, “A methodology for the feasibility assessment of using crop residues for electricity production through GIS-MCD,” Agriculture, vol. 15, no. 3, Art. no. 334, 2025, doi: 10.3390/agriculture15030334.
H. Howari, M. Parvez, O. Khan, M. A. Raza, and M. Al-Alwani, “Multi-objective optimization for ranking waste biomass materials based on performance and emission parameters in a pyrolysis process—An AHP–TOPSIS approach,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, Art. no. 3690, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043690.
H. Akbaş and S. Bilgen, “Priority determination in strategic energy policies in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision making,” Energy, vol. 124, pp. 512–528, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.153.
P. Wang, J. Zhao, Y. Sun, and T. Nguyen, “A hybrid fuzzy analysis network process (FANP) and TOPSIS approaches for solid waste to energy plant location selection in Vietnam,” Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 11, Art. no. 2069, 2018, doi: 10.3390/app8112069.
R. Akpahou and F. Odoi-Yorke, “A multicriteria decision-making approach for prioritizing renewable energy resources for sustainable electricity generation in Benin,” Cogent Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 2204553, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2023.2204553.
J. E. M. Lopes, F. G. Martins, and L. Tavares, “Multi-criteria decision approach to select carbon dioxide and hydrogen sources as potential raw materials for the production of chemicals,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, Art. no. 1204, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031204.
R. Shahraki Shahdabadi, A. Maleki, S. Haghighat, and M. Ghalandari, “Using multi‑criteria decision‑making methods to select the best location for the construction of a biomass power plant in Iran,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 1057–1068, 2020.
P. Gyimah, M. Kwaku, and S. Oduro, “The adoption of renewable energy towards environmental sustainability: Evidence from partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM),” PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 2, Art. no. e0299727, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299727.
T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
A. Yaman, “A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach (GIS-MCDM) for determination of the most appropriate site selection of onshore wind farm in Adana, Turkey,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10098-024-02866-3.
S. Ahmad and R. M. Tahar, “Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia,” Renewable Energy, vol. 63, pp. 458–466, 2014
H. I. Cobuloglu and I. E. Buyuktahtakin, “A stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable biomass crop selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 15–16, pp. 6382–6391, 2015.
J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017.
A. Shalihin, T. Alda, C. E. Revadi, and F. R. P. Nasution, "Consumer intentions to purchase eco-friendly halal food in Medan, Indonesia: An approach using the theory of planned behavior," Engineering Proceedings, vol. 84, no. 1, p. 83, 2025, doi: 10.3390/engproc2025084083.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITB Graduate School Conference
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
