Analysis of the Effect of Biomass Sawdust Co-firing on the Operational Parameters and Maintenance Policies of Pulverized Coal Type Boilers at Indramayu Power Plant
Keywords:
Co-Firing, Sawdust, coal, pulverizer, boiler, tube thicknessAbstract
This study evaluates the implementation of co-firing 5% sawdust with 95% coal at the Indramayu Power Plant, focusing on fuel characteristics, operational performance of the pulverizer and boiler, steam and electricity generation, and the post-operation condition of boiler tube thickness. Sawdust has a lower calorific value (3717 kCal/kg) compared to coal (3807 kCal/kg) and a high moisture content (51.42%), both of which influence combustion efficiency. However, its very low sulfur (0.01%) and nitrogen (0.42%) content suggests potential for emission reduction. During 24 hours of operation, the pulverizer system showed a maximum motor current of 39.11 Amperes and an outlet temperature range of 56–64 °C, indicating safe and stable performance. The boiler system remained optimal with a superheater outlet temperature of 623 °C and a primary steam pressure of 16.83 MPa. A reduction of 0.29 mm in boiler tube thickness was observed in the superheater area, likely due to prolonged exposure to high temperatures, but still within acceptable safety margins. The results confirm that co-firing 5% sawdust is technically feasible without compromising plant reliability. Nonetheless, precise combustion control and continuous monitoring of emissions and material degradation are necessary to ensure longterm operational safety and environmental compliance.
Downloads
References
X. Wang et al., “Experimental Study and Design of Biomass Co-Firing in a Full-Scale Coal-Fired Furnace with Storage Pulverizing System,” Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 810, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/agronomy11040810.
N. Cahyo et al., “A techno-economic and environmental analysis of co-firing implementation using coal and wood bark blend at circulating fluidized bed boiler,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 726–735, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.61435/ijred.2024.60234.
H. Zhang, L. Sun, hongxia zhao, X. Zhang, and G. XIN, “Thermodynamic Analysis of the Coal-Fired Combined Heat and Power Units Integrated with Steam Ejectors and Thermal Storage,” 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4753849.
N. Asminah, S. Nurkhopipah, and N. Nurya, “Efektivitas Economizer Pada Boiler Z-1101 A di PT X Indramayu,” Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Universitas Lampung, vol. 5, no. 2, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.23960/jpi.v5n2.130.
H. Kuncoro and A. R. Prayuda, “Analisis Karakteristik Simulator Boiler Sebagai Acuan Perencanaan Ulang Boiler Kapasitas 100 kg/jam,” Turbo : Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Mesin, vol. 13, no. 2, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.24127/trb.v13i2.3665.
A. Gani et al., “Proximate and ultimate analysis of corncob biomass waste as raw material for biocoke fuel production,” Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, vol. 8, p. 100525, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100525.
R. Ranjeeth, D. Aditya, A. Gautam, S. P. Singh, and S. Bhattacharya, “Failure investigation of a water-wall tube of fossil-fuel fired boiler,” Eng Fail Anal, vol. 155, p. 107727, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107727.
S. S. Matin and S. C. Chelgani, “Estimation of coal gross calorific value based on various analyses by random forest method,” Fuel, vol. 177, pp. 274–278, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.031.
Q.-V. Bach and Ø. Skreiberg, “Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 54, pp. 665–677, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITB Graduate School Conference

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
