Thermodynamic Assessment of Oxy-Fuel Retrofit with Flue Gas Recycle in a Subcritical Coal Power Plant

Authors

  • Dian Akbar Karismasani Mechanical Engineering Master Program, Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl Ganesha 10, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
  • Firman Bagja Juangsa Mechanical Engineering Master Program, Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl Ganesha 10, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia

Keywords:

Emission, Oxyfuel, Process Simulation, Subcritical Boiler, Wet Flue Gas

Abstract

Achieving net zero emissions targets requires deep decarbonization of coal-fired power plants, particularly in countries like Indonesia where coal remains dominant in the electricity mix. As early plant retirement poses risks to energy security, retrofit solutions such as oxy-fuel combustion offer a transitional pathway. This study investigates the thermal feasibility of oxy-fuel combustion with wet flue gas recycle applied to a subcritical pulverized coal plant, using Suralaya Unit 8 (625 MW) as a reference case. A steady-state Aspen Plus model is developed to compare air-fired and oxy-fuel scenarios, with oxygen mass flow fixed and the flue gas recycle tuned to match flue gas heat capacity. Results show that the oxy-fuel case maintains equivalent gross output (560.95 MW) and boiler efficiency (83.21%) while exhibiting higher adiabatic flame (1,652.8°C) and furnace exit temperatures (1,283.4°C), increasing slagging risk. The flue gas outlet temperature rises sharply to 389.7°C due to air preheater bypass, underscoring the need for flue gas cooling or heat recovery systems to protect downstream units. Gas composition analysis reveals significant enrichment in CO₂ (46.1%) and H₂O, along with lower volumetric flow and density, which may allow repurposing of air-side fans and partially offset the ASU energy penalty (~82.6 MW).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

UNFCCC, “The Paris Agreement - Status of Ratification,” 2024. https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/status-of-ratification (accessed Dec. 12, 2024).

IEA, “Net Zero by 2050,” 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (accessed Jan. 16, 2025).

IPCC, “Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change,” 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf (accessed Dec. 24, 2024).

Ember, “Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data,” 2024. https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix (accessed Jan. 15, 2025).

ESDM, “Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasional,” 2024. Accessed: Jan. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://gatrik.esdm.go.id/assets/uploads/download_index/files/2f251-rukn-2024.pdf.

PLN, “Sustainability Report Tahun 2022,” 2022. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://web.pln.co.id/statics/uploads/2023/09/SR-PLN-2022_High.pdf.

Stępczyńska-Drygas, K., Łukowicz, H., & Dykas, S., “Calculation of an advanced ultra-supercritical power unit with CO2 capture installation,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 74, pp. 201–208, Oct. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.04.045.

Xu, G., Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Liang, F., Xu, C., & Yang, Y., “Optimum superheat utilization of extraction steam in double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants,” Applied Energy, vol. 160, pp. 863–872, Dec. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.027.

Hossein Sahraei, M., McCalden, D., Hughes, R., & Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A., “A survey on current advanced IGCC power plant technologies, sensors and control systems,” Fuel, vol. 137, pp. 245–259, Dec. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.086.

Aziz, M., Juangsa, F. B., Kurniawan, W., & Budiman, B. A., “Clean Co-production of H2 and power from low rank coal,” Energy, vol. 116, pp. 489–497, Dec. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2016.09.135.

Takahashi, M., “Document of the World Bank Republic of Indonesia The Indonesia Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) Capacity Building Program CCS for Coal-fired Power Plants in Indonesia,” Washington, D.C, 2015. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/563781468284373788/Indonesia-The-Indonesia-carbon-capture-storage-CCS-capacity-building-program-CCS-for-coal-fired-power-plants-in-Indonesia.

Wang, X. & Song, C., “Carbon Capture From Flue Gas and the Atmosphere: A Perspective,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 8. Frontiers Media S.A., Dec. 15, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.560849.

Huang, X. et al., “Simulation of CO2 Capture Process in Flue Gas from Oxy-Fuel Combustion Plant and Effects of Properties of Absorbent,” Separations, vol. 9, no. 4, Apr. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9040095.

Bui, M. et al., “Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 11, no. 5. Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 1062–1176, May 01, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02342a.

Raho, B., Colangelo, G., Milanese, M., & de Risi, A., “A Critical Analysis of the Oxy-Combustion Process: From Mathematical Models to Combustion Product Analysis,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 18. MDPI, Sep. 01, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186514.

IEA, Finkenrath, M., Smith, J., & Volk, D., “Analysis of the Globally Installed Coal-Fired Power Plant Fleet,” 2012. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/fce4b58f-02b5-46fa-ac5c-30e8f7c093b0/CCSRetrofit.pdf.

ESDM & Firmansyah, F. R., “CCS/CCUS in Indonesia,” Hiroshima, Sep. 2023. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.asiaccusnetwork-eria.org/s/S3-2_20230926- 3rd ACN Forum - DG Oil and Gas Indonesia Rev.1 - shared.pdf.

Lockwood, T., Developments in oxyfuel combustion of coal. 2014.

Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F., “Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 283–307, Jan. 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2005.07.001.

Buecker, B., Basics of Boiler and HRSG Design. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell, 2002.

Banaszkiewicz, T., Chorowski, M., & Gizicki, W., “Comparative analysis of oxygen production for oxy-combustion application,” in Energy Procedia, 2014, vol. 51, pp. 127–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.014.

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Karismasani, D. A., & Juangsa, F. B. (2026). Thermodynamic Assessment of Oxy-Fuel Retrofit with Flue Gas Recycle in a Subcritical Coal Power Plant. ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1). Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/579