Process Optimization of Acid Gas Incinerators: Balancing SO₂ Yield and SO₃ Suppression

Authors

  • Opit Ihzantini Departement of Chemical Engineering,Institut Teknologi Bandung, Labtek X Building, Jl Ganesha, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
  • Tri Partono Adhi Departement of Chemical Engineering,Institut Teknologi Bandung, Labtek X Building, Jl Ganesha, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia

Keywords:

Acid Gas, Acid Gas Incinerator, Aspen Hysys, SO₂, SO₃

Abstract

In natural gas processing, hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is a common impurity known for its acidic and toxic properties. This compound is typically converted into sulfur dioxide (SO₂), which serves as a precursor for sulfuric acid production. The conversion process takes place in an Acid Gas Incinerator (AGI), where H₂S reacts with air to form SO₂. However, a side reaction between SO₂ and excess oxygen (O₂) can lead to the formation of sulfur trioxide (SO₃), an undesirable byproduct that can contribute to corrosion and environmental concerns. This study evaluates the performance of the AGI, focusing on maximizing SO₂ production while minimizing SO₃ formation. The simulation is conducted using Aspen HYSYS, employing the SRK-Twu thermodynamic model to accurately represent reaction kinetics and phase behavior. Results indicate that air preheating enhances incinerator performance by improving combustion efficiency and reducing fuel gas demand. Sensitivity analysis reveals that SO₂ and SO₃ yields are significantly influenced by Acid Gas-to-Air Ratio (AAGR), Fuel Gas-to-Acid Gas Ratio (FGAGR), and operating temperature. Optimal performance is achieved when the FGAGR-to-AAGR ratio is maintained within the range of 0.45 to 0.7, ensuring efficient SO₂ conversion while suppressing SO₃ formation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Hamadi M, Ibrahim S, Raj A. Effects of Oxygen Enrichment on Natural Gas Consumption and Emissions of Toxic Gases (CO, Aromatics, and SO2) in the Claus Process. Ind Eng Chem Res 2019;58:16489–501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03408.

Selim H, Al Shoaibi A, Gupta AK. Effect of H2S in methane/air flames on sulfur chemistry and products speciation. Appl Energy

;88:2593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.032.

Barbour W, Oommen R, Sagun Shareef G, Vatavuk WM, EPA. Section 5 - SO 2 and Acid Gas Controls 1995.

Sorrels JL, Baynham A, Randall D, Hancy C. Chapter 2 - Incinerators and Oxidizers. EPA Air Pollut Control Cost Man 2017:1–70.

Jamaludin S, Manaf S, Oortwijn P. World largest tangentially fired acid gas incinerator in LNG plant: Startup and operational experiences. Int Gas Union World Gas Conf Pap 2006;5:2582–8.

Lee G., Friedrich F., Mitchell E. Effect of Fuel Characteristics and Excess Combustion Air on Sulphuric Acid Formation in A Pulverized- Coal-Fired Boiler 1967.

Xiao H, Qi C, Cheng Q, Dou C, Ning X, Ru Y. Experimental and modeling studies of SO 3 homogeneous formation in the post-flame region. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2018;18:2939–47. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.01.0026.

Ibrahim S, Rahman RK, Raj A. A kinetic simulation study to decrease carbon monoxide CO emission from sulfur recovery units SRU. Soc Pet Eng - Abu Dhabi Int Pet Exhib Conf 2018, ADIPEC 2018 2019:1–7. https://doi.org/10.2118/192771-ms.

Sassi M, Gupta AK. Sulfur recovery from acid gas using the Claus process and High Temperature Air Combustion (HiTAC) technology. Am J Environ Sci 2008;4:502–11. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2008.502.511.

Glarborg P, Kubel D, Dam-Johansen K, Chiang HM, Bozzelli JW. Impact of SO2 and NO on CO oxidation under post-flame conditions. Int J Chem Kinet 1996;28:773–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1996)28:10<773::AID-KIN8>3.0.CO;2-K.

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Ihzantini, O., & Adhi, T. P. (2025). Process Optimization of Acid Gas Incinerators: Balancing SO₂ Yield and SO₃ Suppression. ITB Graduate School Conference, 5(1). Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/543