The Development of Vendor Performance Evaluation and Strategies Design Systems Using Fuzzy Best Worst Method (FBWM) and TODIM in PT PLN (Persero)
Keywords:
Vendor Performance, Vendor Development, Strategies Design, Fuzzy, BWM, TODIMAbstract
In realizing its vision and mission, as well as in supporting electricity national fulfillment, PT PLN (Persero) is necessary to be supported by supply chain management, ranging from procurement to delivery activities. In the procurement process, one of the important aspects is the management of vendors, including the evaluation of their performance, to enable PT PLN (Persero) in selecting good performance vendors and determining appropriate development strategies for its vendor improvement. This paper discusses the development of vendor performance evaluation system by setting the criteria, sub criteria, and by a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). In the other hand, fuzzy best-worst method (BWM) is to determine importance weights of the evaluation criteria, while TODIM to asses vendor performance and subsequently to determine vendor development strategies based on its performance. Finally, this study is to develop framework in vendor performance evaluation system and strategies design.
Downloads
References
Bahagia, S. N., Introduction to Logistics and Supply Chain, Bandung: ITB Press, 2021.
Coşkun, S. S., Kumru, M., & Kan, N. M., An integrated framework for sustainable vendor development through vendor evaluation based on sustainability indicators, Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 2022.
Pratiwi, R., Development of Evaluation Indicators for Assessing Vendor Performance at PT INTI, Thesis, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2019.
Niko, A., Business Process Improvement Design for Main Distribution Material Procurement at the Supply Chain Management Division of PT PLN (Persero) Head Office, Thesis, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2020.
Govindan, K., Kaul, A., Darbari, J. D., & Jha, P. C., Analysis of vendor evaluation and selection strategies for sustainable collaboration: A combined approach of best–worst method and TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio, Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4426–4447, 2023.
Afrasiabi, A., Tavana, M., & Di Caprio, D., An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient vendor selection, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(25), 37291–37314, 2022.
Zhang, L. J., Liu, R., Liu, H. C., Shi, H., & Sancibrian, R., Green Vendor Evaluation and Selections: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Models, Methods, and Applications, Mathematical Problems in Engineering (Vol. 2020), 2020.
Deretarla, Ö., Erdebilli, B., & Gündoğan, M., An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Complex Proportional Assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management, Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 2023.
Wang, C. N., Tsai, H. T., Ho, T. P., Nguyen, V. T., & Huang, Y. F., Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for vendor evaluation and selection for oil production projects in Vietnam, Processes, 8(2), 2020.
Govindaraju, R., Akbar, M. I., Gondodiwiryo, L., & Simatupang, T., The application of a decision-making approach based on fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS for selecting a strategic vendor. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 47(4), 406–425, 2015.
Govindaraju, R., & Pratama Sinulingga, J., Supplier Selection Decision-Making in a Manufacturing Company Using the Fuzzy ANP Method, Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 16(1), 1–16, 2017.
Khazaei, M., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A., Ramezani, M., Fooladvand, A., & Azar, A., A multi-criteria vendor evaluation and selection model without reducing the level of optimality, Soft Computing, 27(22), 17175–17188, 2023.
Liou, J. J. H., Chang, M. H., Lo, H. W., & Hsu, M. H., Application of an MCDM model with data mining techniques for green vendor evaluation and selection, Applied Soft Computing, 109, 2021.
Goodarzi, F., Abdollahzadeh, V., & Zeinalnezhad, M., An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization framework for green vendor evaluation and optimal order allocation under uncertainty, Decision Analytics Journal, 4, 100087, 2022
Rezaei, J., Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega, 53,49–57, 2015.
Rezaei, J., Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model, Omega (United Kingdom), 64, 126–130, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITB Graduate School Conference
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
