Factors Influencing Electric Vehicle Adoptions: A Literature Review Based on the UTAUT2 Model

Authors

  • Aisyah Pratiwi Prodi Teknik dan Manajemen Industri FTI ITB
  • Aldila Rizkiana Prodi Teknik dan Manajemen Industri FTI ITB
  • Hasrini Sari Prodi Teknik dan Manajemen Industri FTI ITB

Keywords:

EV, UTAUT2, technology trust, satisfaction with incentive policies

Abstract

The global climate crisis has become a severe issue that impacts all facets of human existence. Over half of the world's CO2 emissions are caused by the transportation sector, with road transport contributing roughly one-sixth of all emissions. In order to lessen the sector's negative environmental effects, it is crucial to create a clean and sustainable transportation system. As an alternative
to internal combustion engines (ICE), Electric Vehicles (EVs) are becoming more and more popular. They are thought to lessen reliance on energy imports. However, there are a number of obstacles to overcome before transportation electrification can be fully implemented globally, including those related to infrastructure, technology, economy, and user acceptance. The Indonesian
government has bolstered its support for EV adoption through policies and laws, including lowering tax incentives and subsidies and building charging infrastructure, in keeping with its pledge to cut Greenhouse Gas emissions (GHG) emissions by 2030. Customers' trust also influences the adoption of EVs in technology since they frequently have concerns about its sustainability, safety, and
performance. This study combines technology trust and incentive policy satisfaction and applies the Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use 2 (UTAUT2) to examine the variables impacting EV adoption. This model was created to elucidate the variables that may impact consumers' choices to switch to EVs for daily transportation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, H. A., Johl, S. K., Shaari, Z. B., Moughal, W., Mazhar, M., Musarat, M. A., . . . Borovkov, A. (2021). Consumer motivation by using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology towards electric vehicle. sustainability.

Ahmad, S., Chaveesuk, S., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2024). Actual use of electric vehicle in Pakistan: a moderating role of charging infrastructure. Urban, Planning and Transport Research.

Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Abdullah, R., Mahmoud, M., Alkinani, M. H., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2021). Factors impacting consumers’ intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production.

Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

Buenavista, J. A., Ong, A. K., Servas, P. J., Ibrahim, Z. K., Gemala, K. C., Base, T. J., . . . Yagin, J. R. (2024). Evaluation of sustainable behavior and acceptance of electric public transportation: A perspective from the Philippines. World Electric Vehicle Journal.

Gunawan, I., Redi, A. A., Santosa, A. A., Maghfiroh, M. F., Pandyaswargo, A. H., & Kurniawan, A. C. (2022). Determinants of customer intentions to use electric vehicle in Indonesia: An integrated model analysis. sustainability.

Herrero, Á., Martín, H. S., & Salmones, M. d.-D. (2017). Explaining the adoption of social networks sites for sharing user-generated content: A revision of the UTAUT2. Computers in Human Behavior.

Jain, N. K., Bhaskar, K., & Jain, S. (2022). What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with

environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support . Research in Transportation Business & Management.

Jansson, J., Pettersson, T., Mannberg, A., Brännlund, R., & Lindgren, U. (2017). Adoption of alternative fuel vehicles: Influence from neighbors, family and coworkers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

Kapousizis, G., Sarker, R., Ulak, M. B., & Geurs, K. (2024). User Aacceptance of Smart E-bikes: What Are The Influential Factors? A CrossCountry Comparison of Five European Countries. Transportation Research Part A.

Kapser, S., & Abdelrahman, M. (2020). Acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery in Germany – Extending UTAUT2 with risk perceptions. Transportation Research Part C.

Khazaei, H., & Tareq, M. A. (2021). Moderating effects of personal innovativeness and driving experience on factors influencing adoption of BEVs in Malaysia: An integrated SEM–BSEM approach. Heliyon.

Korkmaz, H., Fidanoglu, A., Ozcelik, S., & Okumus, A. (2022). User acceptance of autonomous public transport systems: Extended UTAUT2 model. Journal of Public Transportation.

Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). Household factors and adopting intention of battery electric vehicles: a multi-group structural equation model analysis among consumers in Jiangsu Province, China. Natural Hazards.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., . . . Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinic Epidemology.

Mohamed, M., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2018). What hinders adoption of the electric bus in Canadian transit? Perspectives of transit providers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2016). It's about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers’ intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management.

Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management.

Sayarshad, H. R., Mahmoodian, V., & Gao, H. O. (2020). Non-myopic dynamic routing of electric taxis with battery swapping stations. Sustainable Cities and Society.

Scorrano, M., Danielis, R., & Giansoldati, M. (2020). Mandating the use of the electric taxis: The case of Florence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

Simsekoglu, Ö., & Nayum, A. (2019). Predictors of intention to buy a battery electric vehicle among conventional car drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

Singh, H., Singh, V., Singh, T., & Higueras-Castillo, E. (2023). Electric vehicle adoption intention in the Himalayan region using UTAUT2 – NAM model. Case Studies on Transport Policy.

Sung, H.-N., Jeong, D.-Y., Jeong, Y.-S., & Shin, J.-I. (2015). The relationship among self-efficacy, social influence, performance

expectancy, effort expectancy, and behavioral intention in mobile learning service. International Journal of Service, Science and Technology.

Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Prakasam, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2. International Journal of Information Management.

Vassileva, I., & Campillo, J. (2017). Adoption barriers for electric vehicles: Experiences from early adopters in Sweden. Energy.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory od Acceptance and Use of Technology. Forthcoming in MIS Quarterly.

Wang, Y., Huscroft, J. R., Hazen, B. T., & Zhang, M. (2018). Green information, green certification and consumer perceptions of

remanufctured automobile parts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle

adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

Wolbertus, R., Kroesen, M., Hoed, R. v., & Chorus, C. G. (2018). Policy effects on charging behaviour of electric vehicle owners and on purchase intentions of prospective owners: Natural and stated choice experiments. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

Zhang, W., Wang, S., Wan, L., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Information perspective for understanding consumers’ perceptions of electric vehicles and adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part D .

Zhao, J., Su, Y., Fang, M., & Su, M. (2024). Embracing new energy vehicles: An empirical examination of female consumer perspectives. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services .

Zhou, M., Long, P., Kong, N., Zhao, L., Jia, F., & Campy, K. S. (2021). Characterizing the motivational mechanism behind taxi driver’s adoption of electric vehicles for living: Insights from China. Transportation Research Part A.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-20

How to Cite

Pratiwi, A., Rizkiana, A., & Sari, H. (2025). Factors Influencing Electric Vehicle Adoptions: A Literature Review Based on the UTAUT2 Model. ITB Graduate School Conference, 4(1). Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/350

Issue

Section

Articles