Geological Risks Assessment and Quantification in Ulumbu Geothermal Field, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

Authors

  • Angga Putra Pratama Geothermal Engineering Master’s Program - Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering (FTTM), Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
  • Suryantini Suryantini Geothermal Engineering Master’s Program - Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering (FTTM), Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

Keywords:

geologic risk, risk quantification, risk assessment, geothermal, Ulumbu Geothermal Field, hydrothermal system, geology

Abstract

 The Ulumbu geothermal power plant is currently operating with a total capacity of 10 MWe. However, the Ulumbu geothermal field still holds the potential for further resource utilization, with at least 40 MW available for the next
development phase. This further development carries risks of failure, making geological risk assessment and quantification crucial for calculating the success of development drilling in terms of resource risks. The method of geological risk assessment and quantification in geothermal exploration has been previously developed and applied to two fields, Galunggung and Patuha. The more frequently this method is applied to other geothermal fields, the more valid it becomes, considering that each geothermal field has its unique characteristics in terms of geothermal play type and resource conditions. This paper applies the geological risk assessment and quantification method to the Ulumbu geothermal field under two conditions: pre-drilling (3G data before 1992) and post-drilling (1996 drilling data and the latest 3G data). The results show that the pre-drilling condition exhibits a higher geological risk compared to the post-drilling condition

Downloads

References

Matek, B., The Manageable Risks of Conventional Hydrothermal Geothermal Power Systems, Geothermal Energy Association, Feb. 2014. (Journal)

Suryantini, & Wibowo, H., Geologic Risks Assessment and Quantification in Geothermal Exploration Case Studies in Green Field and Developed Prospects. World Geothermal Congress 2015, April. 2015. (Journal)

Hikmi, M., Suryantini, & Ashat, A., Model Probabilitas Dalam Penentuan Lokasi Sumur Panas Bumi Menggunakan Pendekatan Statistik Bayesian, Proceedings the 12th Annual Indonesian Geothermal Association Meeting & Conference, 2019. (Conference Proceedings)

Otis, R. M., & Schneidermann, N., A process for evaluating exploration prospect. AAPG Bulletin, 81(7), pp 1087–1109, 1997. (Conference Proceedings)

Moeck, I., Bendall, B., Minnig, C., Manzella, A., & Yasukawa, K., Geothermal Play Typing-Current Development and Future Trends of a Modern Concept for Geothermal Resources Assessment. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, November 2019, pp 1–6, 2020. (Conference Proceedings)

Wohletz K., and Heiken, G., Volcanology and Geothermal Energy, Berkeley. University of California Press. ISBN : 0-520- 07914-0. 1992. (Book)

Mahon, T., Modjo, S., & Radja, V., Results of a joint scientific study of the Flores Ulumbu geothermal area. Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council, 16, pp 97–104, 1992. (Conference Proceedings)

PT PLN (Persero), Laporan Survei Geosains Tambahan WKP Ulumbu, 2020. (Unpublished report)

PT PLN (Persero), Feasibility Study Report Vol 1: Ulumbu Prospect., 2017. (Unpublished report)

Nasution, A., Yunis, Y., Afif, M., The Ulumbu Geothermal Development West Flores, Eastern Indonesia. The 11th Asian Geothermal Symposium, Chiangmai, Thailand, 2016. (Journal)

Downloads

Published

2025-01-20

How to Cite

Pratama, A. P., & Suryantini, S. (2025). Geological Risks Assessment and Quantification in Ulumbu Geothermal Field, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. ITB Graduate School Conference, 4(1). Retrieved from https://gcs.itb.ac.id/proceeding-igsc/index.php/igsc/article/view/226

Issue

Section

Articles